Spencer v. Escobedo et al
Filing
13
ORDER Discharging 11 Order to Show Cause Regarding Exhaustion, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/2/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BERNARD SPENCER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
A. ESCOBEDO, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01657-SAB (PC)
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE REGARDING EXHAUSTION
[ECF No. 12]
Plaintiff Bernard Spencer is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. On July 22, 2014, the undersigned
20
issued an order to show cause why the first amended complaint should not be dismissed, without
21
prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. Plaintiff filed a response to the order to
22
show cause on August 7, 2014.
23
On the basis of good cause, the undersigned will discharge the order to show cause and allow
24
the action to proceed. However, Plaintiff is advised that by discharging the order to show cause
25
regarding exhaust of the administrative remedies, the Court in no way has made any determination as
26
to whether Plaintiff has or has not appropriately exhausted the available administrative remedies, only
27
that the action may proceed. Plaintiff is advised that the Court presently has a large number of cases
28
1
1
awaiting preliminary screening, and Plaintiff’s first amended complaint will be screened in due course
2
and appropriate orders will issue.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
September 2, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?