Spencer v. Escobedo et al

Filing 13

ORDER Discharging 11 Order to Show Cause Regarding Exhaustion, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/2/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARD SPENCER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. A. ESCOBEDO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-01657-SAB (PC) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING EXHAUSTION [ECF No. 12] Plaintiff Bernard Spencer is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. On July 22, 2014, the undersigned 20 issued an order to show cause why the first amended complaint should not be dismissed, without 21 prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. Plaintiff filed a response to the order to 22 show cause on August 7, 2014. 23 On the basis of good cause, the undersigned will discharge the order to show cause and allow 24 the action to proceed. However, Plaintiff is advised that by discharging the order to show cause 25 regarding exhaust of the administrative remedies, the Court in no way has made any determination as 26 to whether Plaintiff has or has not appropriately exhausted the available administrative remedies, only 27 that the action may proceed. Plaintiff is advised that the Court presently has a large number of cases 28 1 1 awaiting preliminary screening, and Plaintiff’s first amended complaint will be screened in due course 2 and appropriate orders will issue. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 September 2, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?