Aubert v. Madruga et al

Filing 46

ORDER Requiring Planintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's 42 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT within Thirty Days,signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/4/2015. (30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ESS’N A. AUBERT,

8
9
10

Plaintiff,
vs.
E. MADRUGA, et al.,

11

Defendants.

1:13-cv-01659-AWI-EPG-PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT
OF NON-OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
(ECF No. 42.)

12
13
14

On October 30, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 42.)

15

Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion

16

within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l).

17

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

18

1.

Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file

19

an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment

20

of October 30, 2015; and

21
22

2. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action may be dismissed, with
prejudice, for failure to obey the Court=s order and failure to prosecute.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 4, 2015

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE