Boards of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Fryer Roofing Co., Inc. et al
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER to DISMISS: Old Republic Surety Company only, with prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/28/14. (Martin-Gill, S)
1 HENRY Y. CHIU 222927
TUCKER, CHIU, HEBESHA & WARD PC
2 642 Pollasky Avenue, Suite 230
Clovis, California 93612
3 Telephone: (559) 472-9922
Facsimile: (559) 472-9892
4
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION
9
* * *
)
10 BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE
ROOFERS LOCAL 27 HEALTH AND
)
11 WELFARE TRUST FUND, NATIONAL )
ROOFING INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, )
)
12 ROOFERS LOCAL 27, FRESNO
ROOFING CONTRACTORS VACATION )
)
13 FUND, and ROOFERS LOCAL 27
APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND, )
)
14
Plaintiffs,
)
)
15
v.
)
)
16
FRYER ROOFING CO., INC., a California )
)
17 corporation; DAVID BRUCE FRYER;
LEIGH ANN FRYER; INTERNATIONAL )
)
18 FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY;
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
)
)
19
Defendants.
)
)
20
Case No. 1:13-CV-01660-AWI-MJS
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
DISMISS OLD REPUBLIC SURETY
COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE
21
Plaintiffs Boards of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund,
22
23 Roofers Local 27, Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Fund and Roofers Local 27
24 Apprenticeship Training Fund (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)1 and defendant Old Republic Surety
25 Company (“Old Republic,” referred to as DOE 41 in the original Complaint) hereby stipulate,
26 and request an order, as to the following:
27
TUCKER, CHIU,
HEBESHA & WARD PC
642 POLLASKY AVE., #230
CLOVIS, CA 93612
28
1
Former plaintiff National Roofing Industry Pension Plan previously dismissed its claims
against all Defendants, and is therefore no longer a party to this action, or this Stipulation.
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE
1
1.
that the Court dismiss Old Republic from the present action, with prejudice; and
2
2.
that Plaintiffs and Old Republic shall each bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees
3
4
incurred in litigating the claims with respect to one another.
This stipulation and requested order is between Plaintiffs and Old Republic only, and is
5 not intended to affect the claims asserted by Plaintiffs against the other Defendants, or any right
6 of Plaintiffs or the other Defendants, if any, to seek costs and attorneys’ fees from one another.
7
Dated: October 9, 2014.
TUCKER, CHIU HEBESHA & WARD
A Professional Corporation
8
9
By
10
/s/ Henry Y. Chiu
HENRY Y. CHIU
Attorney for Plaintiffs
11
12
Dated: October 9, 2014.
MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES, ET AL.
A Limited Liability Partnership
13
14
By
15
/s/ Justin D. Harris
JUSTIN D. HARRIS
Attorney for Old Republic
16
17
ORDER
18
The above Stipulation is accepted and adopted by the Court.
19
Plaintiffs’ claims against Old Republic are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, with the
20 stipulating parties to bear their own respective costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in litigating the
21 claims between themselves.
22
Said dismissal shall not affect, in any way, any of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs against
23 the remaining Defendants, or their right of Plaintiffs or the other Defendants, if any, to seek costs
24 and attorneys’ fees from one another.
25
26 IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
TUCKER, CHIU,
HEBESHA & WARD PC
28
Dated:
October 28, 2014
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
642 POLLASKY AVE., #230
CLOVIS, CA 93612
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
TUCKER, CHIU,
HEBESHA & WARD PC
28
642 POLLASKY AVE., #230
CLOVIS, CA 93612
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?