Brooks v. Soto et al

Filing 27

ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion For Certificate Of Appealability As Moot (ECF No. 22 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/12/2015. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONQUEL BROOKS, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 J. SOTO, 15 Case No. 1:13-cv-01683-LJO-SAB (HC) ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AS MOOT (ECF No. 22) Respondent. 16 17 On February 5, 2015, the Court adopted the Findings and Recommendation and denied the 18 instant petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 19). On 19 that same date, judgment was entered in accordance with the order denying the petition. (ECF 20 No. 20). On December 31, 2014, Petitioner filed a motion for a certificate of appealability. (ECF 21 No. 18). In the February 5, 2015, order denying the petition, the Court also denied Petitioner’s 22 motion for a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 19). 23 On March 9, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion for certificate of appealability, along with a 24 notice of appeal and a motion to proceed without prepayment of filing fees. (ECF Nos. 21, 22, & 25 23). In the February 5, 2015, order denying the petition, the Court found that “reasonable jurists 26 would not find the Court’s determination that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas corpus 27 relief debatable, wrong, or deserving of encouragement to proceed further” and that Petitioner had 28 “not made the required substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” to justify the 1 1 issuance of a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 19 at 3). 2 In light of the fact the Court denied Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability in 3 the final order dated February 5, 2015, Petitioner’s subsequent motion for a certificate of 4 appealability is DENIED as MOOT. 5 SO ORDERED Dated: March 12, 2015 6 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?