E.S., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al.

Filing 15

ORDER Regarding Joint Stipulation 14 to File Amended Pleading. (1) Plaintiffs' request for leave to file a First Amended Complaint is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiff shall file their First Amended Complaint within 5 calendar days of the date of this ORDER; (3) Defendant City of Visalia's response to Plantiffs' First Amended Complaint shall be served and filed no more than 20 days hereof. The Court notes that Defendant City of Visalia hereby waives notice and accepts service of the pr oposed First Amended Complaint on behalf of Defendant City of Visalia by and through the City's counsel record; (4) All dates currently scheduled in this matter are not affected by this order. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/24/2013. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

E.S., a minor, by and through her
13 guardian ad litem, Valine Gonzalez; J.F.,
a minor, by and through his guardian ad
14 litem, Bridget Flores; and MARIA
MORENO, in each case individually and
15 as successor in interest to Armando
Santibanez, deceased,
16
Plaintiffs,
vs.
17

Case No. 1:13-cv-01697-LJO-BAM
Honorable Lawrence O’Neill
ORDER REGARDING JOINT
STIPULATION TO FILE
AMENDED PLEADING

18 COUNTY OF TULARE, CITY OF
VISALIA, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER
Good cause having been shown, based upon the parties’ signed Joint
Stipulation filed December 23, 2013 (Dkt. 14), and based on the records in the
above-captioned action, this Court hereby orders as follows:
1.
GRANTED;

Plaintiffs’ request for leave to file a First Amended Complaint is

1

2.

Plaintiff shall file their First Amended Complaint within five (5)

2 calendar days of the date this ORDER is filed;
3

3.

Defendant City of Visalia’s response to Plaintiffs’ First Amended

4 Complaint shall be served and filed no more than twenty (20) days hereof. The
5 Court notes that Defendant City of Visalia hereby waives notice and accepts service
6 of the proposed First Amended Complaint on behalf of Defendant City of Visalia by
7 and through the City’s counsel of record;
8

4.

All dates currently scheduled in this matter are not affected by this

9 order.
10
11 IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

December 24, 2013

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-