E.S., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al.

Filing 88

ORDER Re Stipulation to Dismiss 87 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/5/16: This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

E.S., et al.,

1:13-cv-1697-LJO-BAM
Plaintiffs,

7
v.

8
9

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
DISMISS (Doc. 87)

CITY OF VISALIA, et al.,
Defendants.

10
11
12

On February 2, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice this entire action
13
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Doc. 87 at 1. Based on the parties’ stipulation, this Court:
14
1.

DISMISSES with prejudice this entire action and all claims;

2.

VACATES all pending dates and matters; and

3.

DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to close this action.

15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

February 5, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
1