Townsend v. King et al

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING Action, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted Under Section 1983, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 07/27/14. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

REBIO RONNIE TOWNSEND,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

Case No. 1:13-cv-01698-SKO (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE
A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY
BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

AUDREY KING, et al.,
(Docs. 1 and 10)
Defendants.

14
15

_____________________________________/
16
17

Plaintiff Rebio Ronnie Townsend, a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma

18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 15, 2013. On May
19 21, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim under section 1983
20 and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). More
21 than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the
22 Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which
23 relief may be granted.
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

1

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), this action is HEREBY DISMISSED, with

2 prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under
3 section 1983.
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 27, 2014

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2