Ashworth, et al. v. McKesson Corporation, et al.

Filing 24

ORDER to VACATE HEARING With Filing of Remand Motion, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/14/14. The February 3, 2014 Hearing is VACATED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 D.A., a minor by and through his Guardian ad Litem, APRIL WILSON, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 vs. ORDER TO VACATE HEARING WITH FILING OF REMAND MOTION (Docs. 4, 6) McKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 19 20 CASE NO. CV F 13-1700 LJO JLT ______________________________/ 21 22 On November 26, 2013, defendant McKesson Corporation ("McKesson") filed its 23 F.R.Civ.P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 8), and a February 3, 2014 24 hearing has been set for the motion. On November 21, 2013, plaintiffs had filed their motion 25 to remand (doc. 6) for which a January 17, 2014 hearing is set. This Court does not rule on 26 motions for judgment on the pleadings until its jurisdiction and remand issues are settled. In 27 addition, this Court's practice is to decide motions on the record without a hearing. As such, 28 this Court: 1 1 2 1. on the pleadings and ORDERS the parties not to appear on February 3, 2014; 2. 3 4 VACATES the February 3, 2014 hearing on McKesson's motion for judgment ORDERS plaintiffs, no later than 15 days after issuance of an order to deny remand, to file and serve a response to McKesson's motion for judgment on the pleadings; and 3. 5 ORDERS McKesson, no later than seven days after service of plaintiffs' 6 opposition papers, to file and serve optional reply papers for its motion for judgment on the 7 pleadings. If remand is granted, McKesson's motion for judgment on the pleadings will be deemed 8 9 moot. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill January 14, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?