Ashworth, et al. v. McKesson Corporation, et al.
Filing
24
ORDER to VACATE HEARING With Filing of Remand Motion, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/14/14. The February 3, 2014 Hearing is VACATED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
D.A., a minor by and through his
Guardian ad Litem, APRIL WILSON,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
vs.
ORDER TO VACATE HEARING WITH
FILING OF REMAND MOTION
(Docs. 4, 6)
McKESSON CORPORATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
19
20
CASE NO. CV F 13-1700 LJO JLT
______________________________/
21
22
On November 26, 2013, defendant McKesson Corporation ("McKesson") filed its
23
F.R.Civ.P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 8), and a February 3, 2014
24
hearing has been set for the motion. On November 21, 2013, plaintiffs had filed their motion
25
to remand (doc. 6) for which a January 17, 2014 hearing is set. This Court does not rule on
26
motions for judgment on the pleadings until its jurisdiction and remand issues are settled. In
27
addition, this Court's practice is to decide motions on the record without a hearing. As such,
28
this Court:
1
1
2
1.
on the pleadings and ORDERS the parties not to appear on February 3, 2014;
2.
3
4
VACATES the February 3, 2014 hearing on McKesson's motion for judgment
ORDERS plaintiffs, no later than 15 days after issuance of an order to deny
remand, to file and serve a response to McKesson's motion for judgment on the pleadings; and
3.
5
ORDERS McKesson, no later than seven days after service of plaintiffs'
6
opposition papers, to file and serve optional reply papers for its motion for judgment on the
7
pleadings.
If remand is granted, McKesson's motion for judgment on the pleadings will be deemed
8
9
moot.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
January 14, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?