Johnson v. Target Corporation

Filing 13

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/7/2014. Consent/Decline Deadline 2/18/2014. Pleading Amendment Deadline 5/5/2014. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 9/19/2014; Expert 12/1/2014. Mid-Discovery Status Conferen ce set for 7/11/2014 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 12/15/2014; Hearing by 1/12/2015. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/26/2015 ; Hearing by 3/16/2015. Pretrial Conference set for 5/6/2015 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Jury Trial set for 7/7/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

BRIAN JOHNSON,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

v.
TARGET CORPORATION,

14

Defendant.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 13-CV-01714-AWI - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 5/5/2014
Discovery Deadlines:
Non Expert: 9/19/2014
Expert: 12/1/2014
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
7/11/2014 at 8:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 12/15/2014
Hearing: 1/12/2015

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 1/26/2015
Hearing: 3/16/2015

20
21

23

Pre-Trial Conference:
5/6/2015 at 10:30 a.m.
Courtroom 2

24

Trial:

22

25
26
27
28

I.

Date of Scheduling Conference
February 7, 2014.
1

7/7/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 2
Jury trial: 5-10 days

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Christy W. Granieri appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

3

Kymberleigh Damron-Hsiao appeared on behalf of Defendant.

4
5

III.

Information Concerning the Court’s Schedule
Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno Division

6

of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Court Judge caseload in the entire

7

nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil cases in a timely

8

manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and expectations may be met as

9

expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin upon the same date, parties may

10

find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law requires that the Court give any

11

criminal trial priority over civil trials or any other matter. The Court must proceed with a criminal trial

12

even if a civil trial was filed earlier and set for trial first. Continuances of any civil trial under these

13

circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. All

14

parties should be informed that any civil trial set to begin during the time a criminal trial is proceeding

15

will trail the completion of the criminal trial.

16

The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all

17

proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including

18

entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73,

19

and Local Rule 305. The same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate Judges and United

20

States District Court Judges. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge

21

is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. However, the parties are

22

hereby informed that no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected by whether a party chooses to

23

consent.

24

Finally, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing

25

United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant

26

to the Local Rules, Appendix A, reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

27

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

28

District of California.
2

Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

1
2

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

3

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

4

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

5

IV.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

6
7

motion to amend, no later than May 5, 2014.

8

V.

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

9

The parties have exchanged the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1).

10

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before

11
12

September 19, 2014, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before December 1, 2014.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before October 10,

13

2014, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before November 3, 2014. The written designation of

14

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

15

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

16

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

17

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

18

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

19

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

20

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

21

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

22
23
24

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for July 11, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. before the

25

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

26

California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all

27

counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall be e-

28

mailed, in Word format, to [e-mail]. Counsel may appear via CourtCall,
3

1

providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later

2

than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

3

VI.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

4
5

than December 15, 2014, and heard on or before January 12, 2014. Non-dispositive motions are

6

heard at 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the

7

United States District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

8
9

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

10

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

11

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

12

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

13

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

14

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

15

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

16

and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

17
18

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

19

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written

20
21

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days

22

before the noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than January 26, 2015, and heard no

23
24

later than March 16, 2015, in Courtroom 2 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United

25

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

26

and Local Rules 230 and 260.

27

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

28
4

Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication the parties

1
2

are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the

3

motion at least twenty-one days prior to the filing of the motion.

4

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

5

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

6

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

7

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

8

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.

9

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the joint statement of

10

undisputed facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file a

11

joint statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as

12
13

ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

14

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

15

May 6, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before Judge Ishii.

16

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

17

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

18

directly to Judge Ishii's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

19
20

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

21

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

22

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

23

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

24

IX.

25
26

Trial Date
July 7, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States

District Court Judge.

27

A.

This is a jury trial.

28

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5-10 days.
5

C.

1

Counsel's attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

2

California, Rule 285.

3

X.

Settlement Conference

4

The parties do not wish a settlement conference to be set at this time. If they believe a

5

settlement conference is likely to be fruitful in the future, they may file a joint request for the Court to

6

set a conference.

7

XI.

Requests for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

8

Techniques to Shorten Trial

9

Target intends to move the Court to bifurcate the issue of liability from that of damages.

10
11
12
13

XII.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

14

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

15

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

16

handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as

17

provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern

18

District of California.

19

XIV. Effect of this Order

20

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

21

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

22

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

23

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

24

subsequent status conference.

25

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

26

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

27

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

28
6

1

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

2

for granting the relief requested.

3

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 7, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7