Caesar v. Beard, et al.
Filing
70
ORDER REQUIRING Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/15/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
DANNY CAESAR,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
LOPEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01726-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
(Doc. 69)
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff Danny Caesar is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On March 21, 2018, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer regarding Plaintiff’s
19
then-pending motion to compel. (Doc. 66.) On April 20, 2018, Defendants timely filed a response to
20
that order, discussing the meet and confer. (Doc. 67.) On April 24, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiff’s
21
motion to compel regarding the remaining disputes. (Doc. 68.)
22
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order denying his
23
motion to compel, filed on May 7, 2018. (Doc. 69.) In the motion, Plaintiff asserts that counsel had
24
agreed certain items would be produced during the meet and confer process, but he has not received
25
most of them and is uncertain as to when they will be provided. As a result, Plaintiff asserts that he
26
requires an extension of the discovery deadline, current set for May 22, 2018, (Doc. 55), pending the
27
receipt of the additional productions. Plaintiff also seeks reconsideration of his request for sanctions
28
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37.
1
Based on the foregoing, the Court finds it appropriate to require a response from Defendants
1
2
regarding Plaintiff’s motion, to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. Any outstanding productions
3
should be provided to Plaintiff by that date, and the response should advise the Court if there are any
4
remaining issues of dispute.
5
Plaintiff will be permitted to reply to Defendants’ response within fourteen (14) days of it
6
being served. Plaintiff may also re-state in his reply what kind of discovery deadline extension he
7
requires, if any, and state his reason for the extension request. The parties may also advise the Court
8
whether they have stipulated to any agreed, reasonable deadline extension(s).
9
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this
10
order, Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, as described above.
11
Plaintiff shall also be permitted fourteen (14) days from the response to file a reply, as described
12
above.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
May 15, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?