Caesar v. Beard, et al.
Filing
78
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Motion Requesting A Ruling on Motion for Reconsideration; Motion DENIED AS MOOT, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/17/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
DANNY CAESAR,
7
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
LOPEZ, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01726-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
REQUESTING A RULING ON MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
(Doc. No. 77)
12
Plaintiff Danny Caesar is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
13
14
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 7, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 69.) Currently before
15
16
the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting a ruling on his motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 77.)
17
On August 9, 2018, the District Judge denied in part Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, and
18
referred certain matters back to the undersigned for further consideration, if appropriate and necessary.
19
(Doc. No. 75.) The Court addressed those matters in an order issued on August 13, 2018. (Doc. No.
20
76.)
21
22
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request is HEREBY DENIED, as moot. Plaintiff should be receiving
the above-described orders in the mail in due course.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 17, 2018
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?