United States of America v. Mallery et al

Filing 31

ORDER VACATING Dates and REQUIRING Parties to File Dispositional Documents by May 15, 2015, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/2/15. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER VACATING DATES AND REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS BY MAY 15, 2015 v. 13 14 Case No. 1:13-cv-1737-SAB MICHAEL P. MALLERY, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 On October 28, 2013, the United States of America (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against 18 Defendants Michael P. Mallery and Rebeca C. Mallery seeking to enforce a federal tax lien. On 19 February 23, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment to be heard on April 15, 2015. 20 Currently a pretrial conference is set for March 13, 2015 with a bench trial scheduled to 21 start April 28, 2015. On March 2, 2015, the Court conducted an informal telephonic conference 22 to discuss the currently set trial date. During the teleconference, the parties indicated that they 23 have reached a tentative settlement in this action. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. 26 The settlement conference set for March 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto is VACATED; 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2. All other scheduled dates in this action are VACATED; and 2 3. The parties shall file dispositional documents on or before May 15, 2015. 3 4. If the case does not in fact settle, then the parties shall inform the Court’s 4 Courtroom Clerk, Mamie Hernandez, as soon as practicable so that new dates can 5 be set via an informal telephonic conference.. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: March 2, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?