Brumbaugh v. Roberts
Filing
7
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/18/2013. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JERRY DWAYNE BRUMBAUGH,
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
10
11
12
13-cv-1776 AWI-GSA
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
(Doc. 6)
13
14
15
On November 4, 2013, Plaintiff Jerry Dwayne Brumbaugh (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint
along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, in this action. (Doc. 2). The Court denied
16
17
18
Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice, because Plaintiff had not
provided sufficient information for the Court to rule on that motion. On November 14, 2013,
19
Plaintiff submitted a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 6). A review of
20
Plaintiff’s application reveals that he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis, and, accordingly,
21
his application is GRANTED.
22
Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court must conduct an
23
initial review of every pro se complaint to determine whether the complaint is legally sufficient
24
25
under the applicable pleading standards. The Court must dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof,
26
if the Court determines that the complaint is legally frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim
27
upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from
28
1
1
such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If the Court determines that a complaint fails to state a
2
claim, leave to amend may be granted to the extent that the deficiencies in the complaint can be
3
cured by amendment. Plaintiff’s complaint will be screened in due course.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated:
November 18, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?