Ransom v. McCabe et al

Filing 30

ORDER Adopting 14 Findings and Recommendations and Denying 13 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 02/12/15. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

14

Plaintiff,

15

vs.

16

C. McCABE, et al.,
17

Defendants.

18
19
20

1:13cv01779 AWI DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
(Document 13, 14)

Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action.1 Plaintiff filed this action on November 5, 2013.

21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

On July 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order. The matter
was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

23

Rule 302.
24

On September 10, 2014, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations that the motion

25
26
27
28

be denied. Plaintiff did not file objections.
1

Pursuant to Court order dated June 9, 2010, Plaintiff was deemed to be a prisoner with three strikes or more and
therefore unable to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). However, on December 19, 2013, the Court
determined that Plaintiff met the imminent danger exception for purposes of 1915(g).
1

1
2
3
4
5

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Even though some Defendants have now been served, they had not appeared in the action
at the time of Plaintiff’s motion.

6
7
8

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

full; and

9
10
11

The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 10, 2014 are ADOPTED in

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction

(Document 14) is DENIED.

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 12, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2