Ransom v. McCabe et al

Filing 89

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Doe Defendants Should Not be Dismissed from this Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/19/17. Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty Days. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRYAN E. RANSOM, 12 13 14 15 1:13-cv-01779-DAD-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DOE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS CASE vs. McCABE, et al., TWENTY (20) DAY DEADLINE TO RESPOND Defendants. 16 17 18 Bryan E. Ransom (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on 20 November 5, 2013. (ECF No. 1.) 21 The operative First Amended Complaint was filed on July 10, 2014. (ECF No. 10.) 22 This case now proceeds with the First Amended Complaint against defendants C. McCabe, E. 23 Clark, K. Gill, J. Sao, P. Rouch, D. Strome, R. Herrera, S. Dougherty, J. Kaiser, M. Brooks, E. 24 Molina, G. Torres, Quillen, D. Riley, H. Rocha, W. Hayward, J. Faldon (Correctional Officer), 25 and J. Faldon (Nurse), and Doe Defendants 1-40. Plaintiff has not identified any of the Doe 26 Defendants by name or otherwise identified them sufficiently for service of process. Plaintiff 27 shall be required to show cause why the Doe Defendants should not be dismissed from this 28 action for Plaintiff’s failure to identify them for service of process. 1 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of the 3 date of service of this order, Plaintiff is required to file a written response to this order, showing 4 cause why the Doe Defendants should not be dismissed from this case based on Plaintiff’s 5 failure to identify them. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2017 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?