Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 8/21/2014 for receipt of plaintiff's opening brief. The Court further DIRECTS that all other deadlines set forth in the 11/6/2013 Scheduling Order are extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/29/2014. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney at Law: 119433
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-Mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JUAN P. ORTIZ
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JUAN P. ORTIZ
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1 Acting
Commissioner of Social Security.
15
Defendant.
16
) Case No.: 1:13-cv-01792-GSA
)
) ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
) SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
Based upon the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 12), IT IS HEREBY
19
ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time for filing his Opening
20
Brief.
21
22
23
24
25
26
///
///
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on
February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted, therefore, for
Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need
be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the
Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). For simplicity, Plaintiff will refer to the
Acting Commissioner as the Commissioner.
-1-
1
Plaintiff shall file his Opening Brief on or before August 21, 2014. All other
2
deadlines set forth in the November 6, 2013 Scheduling Order shall be extended
3
accordingly.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 29, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?