Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 8/21/2014 for receipt of plaintiff's opening brief. The Court further DIRECTS that all other deadlines set forth in the 11/6/2013 Scheduling Order are extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/29/2014. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney at Law: 119433 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-Mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff JUAN P. ORTIZ 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN P. ORTIZ 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security. 15 Defendant. 16 ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-01792-GSA ) ) ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING ) SCHEDULE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 Based upon the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 12), IT IS HEREBY 19 ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time for filing his Opening 20 Brief. 21 22 23 24 25 26 /// /// 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted, therefore, for Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). For simplicity, Plaintiff will refer to the Acting Commissioner as the Commissioner. -1- 1 Plaintiff shall file his Opening Brief on or before August 21, 2014. All other 2 deadlines set forth in the November 6, 2013 Scheduling Order shall be extended 3 accordingly. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?