Porsch v. Morrison et al
Filing
8
ORDER Disregarding Letter and Granting Plaintiff Thirty Days in Which to FIle an Amended Complaint 7 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/26/13. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TAMMY JOAN PORSCH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 1:13-cv-01795-AWI-SAB
ORDER DISREGARDING LETTER AND
GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS IN
WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
BETH MORRISON, et al.,
(ECF No. 7)
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Tammy Joan Porsch, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on November 6,
18
2013. Plaintiff filed a civil complaint coversheet and a letter to the court which the Court
19
construed as a complaint. On November 15, 2013, Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave
20
to amend. Plaintiff was informed of the legal standards that apply to her claims and informed that
21
to proceed in this action she must file an amended complaint. On December 12, 2013, Plaintiff
22
filed a letter to the Court. Plaintiff’s letter is disregarded and Plaintiff shall be granted thirty days
23
in which to file an amended complaint that complies with the order issued November 15, 2013.
24
As Plaintiff was previously informed, in order to commence a civil action, a plaintiff must
25
file a complaint as required by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff’s
26
complaint must contain complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing
27
that the pleader is entitled to relief. . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations are
28
not required, but “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere
1
1
conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell
2
Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)).
3
Plaintiff is given the following guidance in filing an amended complaint. “Each allegation
4
must be simple, concise, and direct.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(d)(1). A party must state
5
its claims or defenses in numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of
6
circumstances.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(b). “[E]ach claim founded on a separate
7
transaction or occurrence . . . must be stated in a separate count.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
8
10(b).
9
In her amended complaint, Plaintiff shall state as briefly as possible the facts of her case,
10
describing how each defendant is involved. Conclusory allegations are not sufficient to state a
11
plausible claim for relief. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570). Plaintiff
12
shall separate her claims, so that it is clear what her claims are and who the defendants involved
13
are. Further, for each claim, Plaintiff shall clearly and succinctly set forth the facts to state the
14
acts or failure to act by each Defendant that led to a knowing violation of Plaintiff’s federal
15
rights.
16
Plaintiff states that she is “here to begin custody of [her] children.” Plaintiff is advised
17
that the federal court’s jurisdiction is limited in nature and its power to issue equitable orders may
18
not go beyond what is necessary to correct the underlying constitutional violations which form
19
the actual case or controversy. 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(1)(A); Summers v. Earth Island Institute, 555
20
U.S. 488, 493, 129 S.Ct. 1142, 1149 (2009); Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83,
21
103-04, 118 S.Ct. 1003 (1998); City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 101, 103 S.Ct. 1660,
22
1665 (1983); Mayfield v. United States, 599 F.3d 964, 969 (9th Cir. 2010). Until such time as
23
Plaintiff files a complaint that states a claim, this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider her
24
request that her children be returned to her.
25
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
Plaintiff’s letter, filed December 12, 2013, is DISREGARDED;
27
2.
Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file an
28
amended complaint that complies with the order issued November 14, 2013; and
2
1
3.
2
If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that complies with the November 14,
2013 order, this action shall be dismissed.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 26, 2013
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?