Fisher v. Brown et al

Filing 27

ORDER Adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/10/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARY F. FISHER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. JERRY BROWN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:13-cv-01800-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF No. 22] Plaintiff Gary F. Fisher is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On November 4, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and 20 preliminary injunction. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a 22 Findings and Recommendations which was served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that 23 Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not 24 file objections. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 26 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 27 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 8, 2013, are adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is 5 DENIED. 3 and 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: January 10, 2014 9 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?