Fisher v. Brown et al

Filing 33

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to TERMINATE Action Pursuant to Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/27/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GARY F. FISHER,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
JERRY BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01800-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO
PLAINTIFF’S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
[ECF Nos. 30, 32]

Plaintiff Gary F. Fisher is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 8, 2014, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “civil rights leave to amend or motion to
reopen, to be heard, then close case.”
On May 9, 2014, Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone issued an order directing Plaintiff within

22

fourteen (14) days to file a notice of intent as to whether he desired to dismiss the action or merely

23

sought an extension of time to comply with the Court’s April 25, 2014, screening order. Plaintiff

24

failed to respond to the Court’s order.

25

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action

26

without court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an

27

answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who

28

have appeared.” Voluntary dismissal under this rule requires no action on the part of the court and
1

1

divests the court of jurisdiction upon the filing of the notice of voluntary dismissal. See, e.g., United

2

States v. Real Property Located at 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, CA, 545 F.3d 1134, 1145 (9th Cir.

3

2008) (describing consequences of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

4

41(a)(1)(A)).

5

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) does not require a particular form of a notice of dismissal. See Williams v.

6

Ezell, 531 F.2d 1261, 1263 (5th Cir. 1976) (holding that a failure to cite Rule 41 was irrelevant, and

7

giving no weight to plaintiff’s choice to title the document “motion to dismiss” as opposed to “notice

8

of dismissal”). In addition, a notice of voluntary dismissal is effective at the moment it is filed, and no

9

judicial approval or court order is required. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608 (9th Cir. 1993).

10

In this instance, the Court has allowed Plaintiff to clarify his intent as to whether he desired to

11

dismiss the entire action or extend the time for filing a further complaint. Plaintiff failed to heed the

12

Court’s direction, despite having been advised that the Court would construe his May 8, 2014, filing as

13

a notice to voluntarily dismiss pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

14
15

Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Clerk of the
Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close this case.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

Dated: June 27, 2014

19

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2