Valero v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

Stipulation and Order for the award and payment of attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U. S. C. § 2412 (d) and costs pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1920, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/8/2015. (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ERICA VALERO, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. 8 9 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 10 Defendant. 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-01815-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE HONORABLE SHEILA K. OBERTO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Erica Valero be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of three thousand four hundred dollars ($4,900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of sixty dollars ($60.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Erica Valero, the government will consider the matter of Erica Valero’s assignment of EAJA fees to Young Cho. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset -1- 1 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. 2 After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether 3 they are subject to any offset. 4 Fees shall be made payable to Erica Valero, but if the Department of the 5 Treasury determines that Erica Valero does not owe a federal debt, then the 6 government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made 7 directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment 8 executed by Steven Edward Felipe. United States v. $186,416.00, 722 F.3d 1173, 9 1176 (9th Cir. 2013) ($186,416.00 II) (ordering fees paid to counsel because of an 10 assignment that did not interfere with a raised superior lien).1 Any payments made 11 shall be delivered to Vijay J. Patel. 12 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Erica Valero’s 13 request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on 14 the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount 15 shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Erica 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The Commissioner does not stipulate to the citation of $186,416.00 II, and will not participate in representing to this Court that it carries legal import in these proceedings. $186,416 II involved a different statute and very different factual circumstances than those presented here, or in other Social Security cases. Because the parties have agreed to the payment of EAJA fees, and the amount, and to avoid motion practice solely related to Plaintiff’s citation, the Commissioner agrees to this stipulation. The Commissioner reserves the right to challenge the applicability of $186,416 II to any Social Security case, and this Stipulation should not be construed as a waiver of such reservation. Steven Felipe contends that U.S. v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency, 642 F.3d 753, 757 (9th Cir. 2011) ($186,416.00 I) held that there is no functional difference between the CAFRA and EAJA in terms of "ownership" of the fee. -2- 1 Valero and/or Vijay J. Patel including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may 2 have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 3 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Young Cho and/or the Law 4 Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 5 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. 6 DATE: March 12, 2015 7 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 8 /s/ Young Cho BY: __________________ Young Cho Attorney for plaintiff Steven Edward Felipe 9 10 11 Respectfully submitted, DATE: March 12, 2015 12 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 13 /s/ Jean M. Turk Jean M. Turk Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) 14 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 Pursuant to the terms of the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 20 that Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees and expenses in the amount of $4,960.00 21 under the EAJA. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: June 8, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?