Valero v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
Stipulation and Order for the award and payment of attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U. S. C. § 2412 (d) and costs pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1920, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/8/2015. (Rosales, O)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ERICA VALERO,
6
Plaintiff,
7
vs.
8
9
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
10
Defendant.
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01815-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES AND
EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND
COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
§ 1920
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO THE HONORABLE SHEILA K. OBERTO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OF THE DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Erica Valero be
awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of three thousand four hundred
dollars ($4,900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C.
§ 2412(d), and costs in the amount of sixty dollars ($60.00) under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on
behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance
with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Erica Valero, the
government will consider the matter of Erica Valero’s assignment of EAJA fees to
Young Cho. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability
to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset
-1-
1
allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program.
2
After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether
3
they are subject to any offset.
4
Fees shall be made payable to Erica Valero, but if the Department of the
5
Treasury determines that Erica Valero does not owe a federal debt, then the
6
government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made
7
directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment
8
executed by Steven Edward Felipe. United States v. $186,416.00, 722 F.3d 1173,
9
1176 (9th Cir. 2013) ($186,416.00 II) (ordering fees paid to counsel because of an
10
assignment that did not interfere with a raised superior lien).1 Any payments made
11
shall be delivered to Vijay J. Patel.
12
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Erica Valero’s
13
request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on
14
the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount
15
shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Erica
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Commissioner does not stipulate to the citation of $186,416.00 II, and
will not participate in representing to this Court that it carries legal import in these
proceedings. $186,416 II involved a different statute and very different factual
circumstances than those presented here, or in other Social Security cases.
Because the parties have agreed to the payment of EAJA fees, and the amount, and
to avoid motion practice solely related to Plaintiff’s citation, the Commissioner
agrees to this stipulation. The Commissioner reserves the right to challenge the
applicability of $186,416 II to any Social Security case, and this Stipulation should
not be construed as a waiver of such reservation.
Steven Felipe contends that U.S. v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency, 642 F.3d
753, 757 (9th Cir. 2011) ($186,416.00 I) held that there is no functional difference
between the CAFRA and EAJA in terms of "ownership" of the fee.
-2-
1
Valero and/or Vijay J. Patel including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may
2
have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
3
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Young Cho and/or the Law
4
Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under
5
42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
6
DATE: March 12, 2015
7
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
8
/s/ Young Cho
BY: __________________
Young Cho
Attorney for plaintiff Steven Edward Felipe
9
10
11
Respectfully submitted,
DATE: March 12, 2015
12
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
13
/s/ Jean M. Turk
Jean M. Turk
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
(Per e-mail authorization)
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
Pursuant to the terms of the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
20
that Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees and expenses in the amount of $4,960.00
21
under the EAJA.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated:
June 8, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?