Brent Adler v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 3

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis []2 and Directing that Action Proceed pursuant to Local 230(L), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/25/13. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

BRENT ADLER,
Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

13

FERNANDO GONZALEZ, et al.,

14

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:13-cv-01867-SKO PC
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING
THAT ACTION PROCEED PURSUANT TO
LOCAL 230(L)
(Doc. 2)

15
16

Plaintiff Brent Adler, who is proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42

17 U.S.C. § 1983 on November 18, 2013. Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 28
18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff has made the requisite showing and his application is HEREBY
19 GRANTED. Id.
20

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and this action involves past conditions of confinement at

21 California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi. Although Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated,
22 Local Rule 230(l) shall apply to this case. Hunt v. County of Orange, 672 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir.
23 2012) (district courts have broad discretion to manage course of litigation); U.S. v. Batiste, 868
24 F.2d 1089, 1091 n.4 (9th Cir. 1989) (district courts have broad discretion to manage calendars).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28

Dated:

November 25, 2013

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE