Armstrong v. Hicks
Filing
14
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/11/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,
Case No. 1:13-cv-01878-AWI-MJS (PC)
12
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
v.
(ECF No. 11)
14
HICKS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42
19
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was ordered to pay the $400.00 filing fee, or in the alternative
20
submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, by not
21
later than January 21, 2014. The January 21st deadline passed without Plaintiff
22
responding. The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be
23
dismissed for failure to obey the Court’s Order and failure to prosecute. He also was given
24
the option, however, to pay the $400.00 filing fee, or submit a proper application to
25
proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 11.)
26
27
28
On February 3, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No.
12), and the Court granted it. (ECF No. 13.)
Accordingly, for the reasons stated, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Order to Show
1
1
Cause (ECF No. 11) is DISCHARGED.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated:
17
February 11, 2014
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC _Signature- END:
18
Michael J. Seng
12eob4
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?