Stine v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, DECLINING TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 21 AND DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 20 signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/7/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MIKEAL STINE,
11
Plaintiff
12
13
14
CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1883 AWI MJS
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, and
“UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS”
15
Defendant
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION,
DECLINING TO ADOPT FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION, AND
DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL
(Doc. Nos. 20, 21)
16
17
On September 9, 2015, the Court revoked Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and gave
18
19
Plaintiff fourteen days in which to pay the requisite filing fee. See Doc. No. 22. The Court
20
warned Plaintiff that the failure to timely pay the filing fee would result in the dismissal of this
21
case without further notice. See id. More than fourteen days have passed, and Plaintiff has failed
22
to pay the filing fee. Because Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, the Court will dismiss this
23
case.
24
Additionally, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation on July 28,
25
2015 (Doc. No. 21), and on July 27, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No.
26
20). Because the Court is dismissing this case for failing to pay the filing fee, the Court will
27
decline to adopt the Findings and Recommendation and deny Plaintiff’s motion to appoint
28
counsel.
1
ORDER
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay a filing fee;
4
2.
The Court DECLINES to adopt the July 28, 2015 Findings and Recommendation (Doc.
5
6
No. 21) in light of the dismissal; and
3.
Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED as moot.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 7, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?