Stine v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Filing 23

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, DECLINING TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 21 AND DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 20 signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/7/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MIKEAL STINE, 11 Plaintiff 12 13 14 CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1883 AWI MJS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, and “UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS” 15 Defendant ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, DECLINING TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL (Doc. Nos. 20, 21) 16 17 On September 9, 2015, the Court revoked Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and gave 18 19 Plaintiff fourteen days in which to pay the requisite filing fee. See Doc. No. 22. The Court 20 warned Plaintiff that the failure to timely pay the filing fee would result in the dismissal of this 21 case without further notice. See id. More than fourteen days have passed, and Plaintiff has failed 22 to pay the filing fee. Because Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, the Court will dismiss this 23 case. 24 Additionally, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation on July 28, 25 2015 (Doc. No. 21), and on July 27, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 26 20). Because the Court is dismissing this case for failing to pay the filing fee, the Court will 27 decline to adopt the Findings and Recommendation and deny Plaintiff’s motion to appoint 28 counsel. 1 ORDER 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay a filing fee; 4 2. The Court DECLINES to adopt the July 28, 2015 Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 5 6 No. 21) in light of the dismissal; and 3. Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED as moot. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 7, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?