Jaimes v. Herrera, et al.

Filing 93

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's July 12, 2017 89 Request signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/13/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUAN JAIMES, Plaintiff, v. S. HERRERA, et al., Defendants. 13 14 Case No.: 1:13-cv-01884-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S JULY 12, 2017 REQUEST (ECF No. 89) Plaintiff Juan Jaimes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 15 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 16 recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. Plaintiff 17 was ordered to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. Plaintiff did 18 not file objections and on June 1, 2017, District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neil adopted the findings and 19 recommendations, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted, and judgment was entered 20 in favor of Defendants. On June 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed two untimely objections to the findings and 21 recommendations. On June 14, 2017, Defendants filed a response to Plaintiff’s objections. On July 22 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a request and a notice of appeal. On this same date, Plaintiff’s notice of 23 appeal was processed to the Ninth Circuit. On April 19, 2017, the undersigned issued findings and 24 In the document filed on July 12, 2017, Plaintiff states that he has received Defendants’ 25 response to his objections to the findings and recommendations, but has not received a “final 26 response” which the Court construes as a request for an order addressing his objections and 27 Defendants’ response. Plaintiff states that he wants to know if his case will be reinstated. At this 28 1 1 time, no order has issued addressing Plaintiff’s objections or Defendants’ response. These documents 2 shall be addressed in due time and at that time Plaintiff will be served with a copy of the order. 3 Plaintiff seeks an extension of time of 60 days to proceed with his motion for summary 4 judgment. However, there are no due dates pending and Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is 5 denied as moot. 6 Plaintiff seeks for the Court to provide transcripts for appeal and conformed copies for his 7 records. The docket does not reflect any hearing was held in this matter. Plaintiff is notified that the 8 appellate court has access to the court’s file in this case, and will request any necessary documents that 9 are in the record directly from this court. 10 Plaintiff seeks a conformed copy. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks copies of documents filed 11 in this action, Plaintiff may request copies of court filings by sending a self-addressed, stamped 12 envelope and letter setting forth the copy request, along with pre-payment of the required fee, to the 13 Clerk of this Court. Copies of up to 20 pages will be made at a charge of $.50 per page. Based on the forgoing, Plaintiff’s request filed July 12, 2017, is HEREBY DENIED. 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: 18 July 13, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?