Jaimes v. Herrera, et al.

Filing 93

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's July 12, 2017 89 Request signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/13/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
10
11
12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

JUAN JAIMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
S. HERRERA, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01884-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S JULY 12, 2017
REQUEST
(ECF No. 89)

Plaintiff Juan Jaimes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

15

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

16

recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. Plaintiff

17

was ordered to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. Plaintiff did

18

not file objections and on June 1, 2017, District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neil adopted the findings and

19

recommendations, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted, and judgment was entered

20

in favor of Defendants. On June 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed two untimely objections to the findings and

21

recommendations. On June 14, 2017, Defendants filed a response to Plaintiff’s objections. On July

22

12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a request and a notice of appeal. On this same date, Plaintiff’s notice of

23

appeal was processed to the Ninth Circuit.

On April 19, 2017, the undersigned issued findings and

24

In the document filed on July 12, 2017, Plaintiff states that he has received Defendants’

25

response to his objections to the findings and recommendations, but has not received a “final

26

response” which the Court construes as a request for an order addressing his objections and

27

Defendants’ response. Plaintiff states that he wants to know if his case will be reinstated. At this

28
1

1

time, no order has issued addressing Plaintiff’s objections or Defendants’ response. These documents

2

shall be addressed in due time and at that time Plaintiff will be served with a copy of the order.

3

Plaintiff seeks an extension of time of 60 days to proceed with his motion for summary

4

judgment. However, there are no due dates pending and Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is

5

denied as moot.

6

Plaintiff seeks for the Court to provide transcripts for appeal and conformed copies for his

7

records. The docket does not reflect any hearing was held in this matter. Plaintiff is notified that the

8

appellate court has access to the court’s file in this case, and will request any necessary documents that

9

are in the record directly from this court.

10

Plaintiff seeks a conformed copy. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks copies of documents filed

11

in this action, Plaintiff may request copies of court filings by sending a self-addressed, stamped

12

envelope and letter setting forth the copy request, along with pre-payment of the required fee, to the

13

Clerk of this Court. Copies of up to 20 pages will be made at a charge of $.50 per page.
Based on the forgoing, Plaintiff’s request filed July 12, 2017, is HEREBY DENIED.

14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17

Dated:

18

July 13, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2