California River Watch v. County of Madera

Filing 18

Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice; ORDER signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/25/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Jack Silver, Esq. SB #160575 E-mail:lhm28843@sbcglobal.net Law Office of Jack Silver Post Office Box 5469 Santa Rosa, CA 95402-5469 Tel.(707) 528-8175 Fax.(707) 528-8675 David J. Weinsoff, Esq. SB # 141372 Email: david@weinsofflaw.com Law Office of David J. Weinsoff 138 Ridgeway Avenue Fairfax, CA 94930 Tel. (415) 460-9760 Fax. (415) 460-9762 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH a 501(c)(3),non-profit, Public Benefit Corporation, Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER [FRCP § 41(a)(1)(ii)] v. 16 CASE NO.: 1:13-CV-01893-AWI-SMS COUNTY OF MADERA, et al, 17 Trial Date: December 8, 2015 Defendants. / 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER 20 WATCH and defendant COUNTY OF MADERA by and through their counsel of 21 record, that this matter may be dismissed with prejudice, each party hereto to bear 22 its own costs and attorney’s fees. 23 24 DATED: July 25, 2014 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYNE & CARRUTH LLP 25 26 By: 27 28 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [Proposed] Order 1:13-cv-01893-AWI-SMS /s/ Matthew E. Fletcher Matthew E. Fletcher Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF MADERA 1 In addition to stipulating to the above, I, Jack Silver, attest that concurrence in the 2 filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from each of the signatories to this document. I 3 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 4 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 25th day of July, 2014. 5 6 DATED: July 25, 2014 7 LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER By: 8 9 /s/ Jack Silver Jack Silver Attorney for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH 10 11 ORDER 12 Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed, 13 IT IS SO ORDERED that this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 25, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [Proposed] Order 1:13-cv-01893-AWI-SMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?