California River Watch v. County of Madera
Filing
18
Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice; ORDER signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/25/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Jack Silver, Esq. SB #160575
E-mail:lhm28843@sbcglobal.net
Law Office of Jack Silver
Post Office Box 5469
Santa Rosa, CA 95402-5469
Tel.(707) 528-8175
Fax.(707) 528-8675
David J. Weinsoff, Esq. SB # 141372
Email: david@weinsofflaw.com
Law Office of David J. Weinsoff
138 Ridgeway Avenue
Fairfax, CA 94930
Tel. (415) 460-9760
Fax. (415) 460-9762
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH
a 501(c)(3),non-profit, Public Benefit
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
15
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE; ORDER
[FRCP § 41(a)(1)(ii)]
v.
16
CASE NO.: 1:13-CV-01893-AWI-SMS
COUNTY OF MADERA, et al,
17
Trial Date: December 8, 2015
Defendants.
/
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER
20
WATCH and defendant COUNTY OF MADERA by and through their counsel of
21
record, that this matter may be dismissed with prejudice, each party hereto to bear
22
its own costs and attorney’s fees.
23
24
DATED: July 25, 2014
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYNE & CARRUTH LLP
25
26
By:
27
28
Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [Proposed] Order
1:13-cv-01893-AWI-SMS
/s/ Matthew E. Fletcher
Matthew E. Fletcher
Attorney for Defendant
COUNTY OF MADERA
1
In addition to stipulating to the above, I, Jack Silver, attest that concurrence in the
2
filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from each of the signatories to this document. I
3
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
4
foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 25th day of July, 2014.
5
6
DATED: July 25, 2014
7
LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER
By:
8
9
/s/ Jack Silver
Jack Silver
Attorney for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH
10
11
ORDER
12
Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed,
13
IT IS SO ORDERED that this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 25, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [Proposed] Order
1:13-cv-01893-AWI-SMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?