Fresquez v. County of Stanislaus et al

Filing 12

ORDER CONTINUING Mandatory Scheduling Conference Fourteen-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/15/14: Scheduling Conference RESET to 3/11/2014 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOVEADA FRESQUEZ, 11 Case No. 1:13-cv-01897-AWI-SAB Plaintiff, 12 ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. 13 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Due to the pending Motion to Dismiss currently pending before the District Court, the 17 18 Scheduling Conference in this action is reset from January 21, 2014 to March 11, 2014 at 2:30 19 P.M. in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. On November 22, 2013, the Court issued an Order setting the mandatory scheduling 20 21 conference date and informing the parties of the form of and information to be submitted in their 22 scheduling report. Defendants have submitted a Scheduling Report which does not comport with 1 23 this Court’s Scheduling Conference Order . Defendants are referred to the Order issued 24 November 22, 2013 for the form and content of the Scheduling Report that is required by the 25 Court. Plaintiff is advised that she is required to participate in the Scheduling Report and 26 27 28 1 The Court notes that Plaintiff did not participate in the Scheduling Report as her counsel is not admitted to practice in Federal Court. In an Order issued January 10, 2014, the Court noted that Plaintiff’s counsel has been provided with a Petition by Attorney for Admission form, but has not sought admission to practice before this Court. 1 1 Scheduling Conference. If Plaintiff is unable to participate in a joint statement, then she is 2 required to file a separate scheduling report that comports with the Court’s Scheduling 3 Conference Order. The parties shall file an Amended Scheduling Report that comports with the 4 Scheduling Conference Order at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the continued scheduling 5 conference date. 6 Finally, Plaintiff’s counsel has not filed a Petition for Admission to this court. 7 Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall 8 notify the Court of the status of her legal representation in this action. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?