Fresquez v. County of Stanislaus et al
ORDER CONTINUING Mandatory Scheduling Conference Fourteen-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/15/14: Scheduling Conference RESET to 3/11/2014 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Hellings, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:13-cv-01897-AWI-SAB
ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.,
Due to the pending Motion to Dismiss currently pending before the District Court, the
18 Scheduling Conference in this action is reset from January 21, 2014 to March 11, 2014 at 2:30
19 P.M. in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.
On November 22, 2013, the Court issued an Order setting the mandatory scheduling
21 conference date and informing the parties of the form of and information to be submitted in their
22 scheduling report. Defendants have submitted a Scheduling Report which does not comport with
23 this Court’s Scheduling Conference Order .
Defendants are referred to the Order issued
24 November 22, 2013 for the form and content of the Scheduling Report that is required by the
Plaintiff is advised that she is required to participate in the Scheduling Report and
The Court notes that Plaintiff did not participate in the Scheduling Report as her counsel is not admitted to practice
in Federal Court. In an Order issued January 10, 2014, the Court noted that Plaintiff’s counsel has been provided
with a Petition by Attorney for Admission form, but has not sought admission to practice before this Court.
1 Scheduling Conference. If Plaintiff is unable to participate in a joint statement, then she is
2 required to file a separate scheduling report that comports with the Court’s Scheduling
3 Conference Order. The parties shall file an Amended Scheduling Report that comports with the
4 Scheduling Conference Order at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the continued scheduling
5 conference date.
Finally, Plaintiff’s counsel has not filed a Petition for Admission to this court.
7 Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall
8 notify the Court of the status of her legal representation in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 15, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?