Crisp v. Wasco State Prison

Filing 60

ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's Motions for Extensions of Time to Conduct Discovery and to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Since Moot 47 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 54 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/30/16. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

OBIE LEE CRISP,

7

Plaintiff,

8
9

v.
WASCO STATE PRISON, et al.,

10

Case No. 1:13-cv-01899-AWI-SKO (PC)
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME
TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND TO
FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SINCE MOOT

Defendants.
(Docs. 47, 49, 51, 52, 54)

11
12

Plaintiff, Obie Lee Crisp, III, is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
13
in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 28, 2015, Defendants filed a
14

motion for summary judgment raising Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the available administrative

15
remedies before filing suit. (Doc. 34.) Subsequently, Plaintiff filed a number of motions
16
requesting extensions of time to file his opposition, various of which were granted. (See Docs.
17
38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 54.) Defendants’ motion was recently denied as they
18
failed to meet their burden on moving for summary judgment. (Docs. 56, 59). This mooted
19
Plaintiff’s outstanding motions for extensions of time relating to his opposition. (See Docs. 47,
20
49, 51, 52, 54.)
21
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s outstanding motions for extension
22
of time relating to his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Docs. 47, 49, 51,
23
52, 54) are DISREGARDED since moot.
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
Dated:

September 30, 2016

/s/

27

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1

.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2