Poslof v. CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations, et al

Filing 33

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, Dismissing Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Claim Of Deliberate Indifference, And Referring Matter Back To Magistrate Judge For Initiation Of Service Of Process (ECF Nos. 28 , 29 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/12/2015. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LONNIE LEE POSLOF, Sr.,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
CDCR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01935-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT,
DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH
AMENDMENT CLAIM OF DELIBERATE
INDIFFERENCE, AND REFERRING MATTER
BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
INITIATION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
[ECF Nos. 28, 29]

Plaintiff Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr. is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
On December 3, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation which was

21

served on Plaintiff and contained notice that Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to

22

be filed within twenty days.

23

Plaintiff filed objections on December 3, 2014. Local Rule 304(b).

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

25

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

26

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

27

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

28

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on December 3, 2014 is adopted in full; and
1

This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s RLUIPA claim against Defendant Beard and

1

2.

2

Does 1 through 10;

3

3.

4

need is DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief; and

5

4.

Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical

The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for initiation of service of process.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated: January 12, 2015

9

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2