Hamilton v. United States of America
Filing
41
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER DISMISSING signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/11/15. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
CECIL HAMILTON and DIANNE HAMILTON,
Individually and as Successors, DAMAGES FOR In
Interest, ESTATE OF WILLIAM E. HAMILTON,
Decedent,
5
Plaintiffs,
6
v.
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
8
Defendant.
9
10
11
12
13
Pursuant to the terms of a written Stipulation for Compromise as well as the provisions of Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties hereby stipulate that this action be dismissed with prejudice.
Each party is to bear their/its own attorneys fees and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Respectfully submitted,
14
15
Dated: December 9, 2015
16
18
Dated: November 10, 2015
/s/David C. Anderson
David C. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20
21
ORDER
22
23
24
25
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
/s/Alyson A. Berg
Alyson A. Berg
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant United States
17
19
)
) Case No. 1:13-cv-01940 LJO-MJS
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The above stipulation is APPROVED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
December 11, 2015
27
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
29
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER
30
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?