Hamilton v. United States of America

Filing 41

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER DISMISSING signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/11/15. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 CECIL HAMILTON and DIANNE HAMILTON, Individually and as Successors, DAMAGES FOR In Interest, ESTATE OF WILLIAM E. HAMILTON, Decedent, 5 Plaintiffs, 6 v. 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 Defendant. 9 10 11 12 13 Pursuant to the terms of a written Stipulation for Compromise as well as the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties hereby stipulate that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear their/its own attorneys fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Dated: December 9, 2015 16 18 Dated: November 10, 2015 /s/David C. Anderson David C. Anderson Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 ORDER 22 23 24 25 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY /s/Alyson A. Berg Alyson A. Berg Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant United States 17 19 ) ) Case No. 1:13-cv-01940 LJO-MJS ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The above stipulation is APPROVED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: December 11, 2015 27 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 29 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER 30 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?