Boyd v. Etchebehere et al

Filing 38

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES re 14 , 35 , 37 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/1/2015. (Discovery due by 12/10/2015. Dispositive Motions filed by 2/10/2016). (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS BOYD, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. C. ETCHEBEHERE, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-01966-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES [ECF Nos. 14, 35, 37] Plaintiff Curtis Boyd is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 1, 2015, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment relating to exhaustion of the administrative remedies was denied. (ECF No. 37.) 21 On September 18, 2014, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order in this case 22 setting the deadline for completion of all discovery by May 18, 2015, and the deadline for the filing of 23 dispositive motion was July 30, 2015. (ECF No. 14.) 24 25 On January 9, 2015, the Court granted Defendant’s request to stay discovery pending resolution of the exhaustion motion. (ECF No. 23.) 26 In light of the fact that discovery was stayed pending resolution of the motion for summary 27 judgment on exhaustion and the discovery and dispositive motion have now expired, the Court will 28 extend both deadlines. The discovery deadline is extended to December 10, 2015, and the dispositive 1 1 motion deadline is extended to February 10, 2016. All other provisions of the Court’s September 18, 2 2014, discovery and scheduling order remain in full force and effect. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 September 1, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?