Boyd v. Etchebehere et al
Filing
90
ORDER DENYING 89 Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice as Unnecessary signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/11/2017. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CURTIS BOYD,
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
C. ETCHEBEHERE, et.al.
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:13-01966-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AS UNNECESSARY
[ECF No. 89]
Plaintiff Curtis Boyd is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On April 10, 2017, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Request for Court to take judicial notice
20
of Plaintiff’s need to have summary judgment ruling delayed.” Plaintiff requests that the Court delay
21
ruling on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment filed on February 6, 2017, until Plaintiff files his
22
opposition.
23
On April 4, 2017, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s
24
January 13, 2017, order denying his motion to compel and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an
25
opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 88.) Plaintiff’s opposition is
26
presently due on or before May 4, 2017. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request to delay ruling on
27
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment shall be denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff is advised,
28
however, that his request was not signed and unsigned documents cannot be considered by the Court.
1
1
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); Local Rule 131(b). Thus, if future unsigned documents are submitted to the
2
Court for filing, Plaintiff is advised that such filing may and will be stricken from the record without
3
consideration by the Court.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
April 11, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?