Bryson v. Gerson et al

Filing 14

ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 13 for Service of Cognizable Claims in First Amended Complaint against Defendant Executive Office for United States Attorneys, and to Dismiss All Other Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/15/14. 30-Day Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 USM Form and Civil Instructions)(Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR., 12 13 14 CASE NO. 1:13-cv-01979-LJO-MJS ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (1) FOR SERVICE OF COGNIZABLE CLAIMS IN FIRST AMENDED COMPALINT AGAINST DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, AND (2) TO DISMISS ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS Plaintiff, v. SUSAN B. GERSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 (ECF Nos. 9, 13) 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. (ECF Nos. 4 & 9.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 21, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations (ECF No. 13) that (1) Plaintiff should proceed on the first amended complaint FOIA claim against Defendant Executive Office for United States Attorneys, and (2) all other claims asserted in the first amended complaint and all other named 1 Defendants should be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff did not object to the Findings 2 and Recommendations and the time for doing so has passed. 3 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has 4 conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 5 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by 6 proper analysis. 7 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 13), filed on November 21, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 2014, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff is to proceed on the first amended complaint FOIA claim against Defendant Executive Office for United States Attorneys; 3. All other claims asserted in the first amended complaint and all other named Defendants are dismissed with prejudice; 4. Service should be initiated on the following Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS 16 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff one (1) USM-285 form, one 17 (1) summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction 18 sheet, and a copy of the first amended complaint, filed September 8, 2014; 19 6. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff is to complete and 20 return to the Court the notice of submission of documents along with the 21 following documents: 22 a. Completed summons; 23 b. One completed USM-285 form for the Defendant listed above, 24 c. Two copies of the endorsed first amended complaint filed September 8, 25 2014; and 26 27 28 2 1 7. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the 2 United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendant pursuant to 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill December 15, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?