Forte v. Hughes et al

Filing 118

REQUEST for U.S. Attorney's Office to Prosecute 117 Criminal Contempt, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/20/2017. (The Court requests that the U.S. Attorney's Office inform the Court by 1/27/2017, whether it will prosecute this case and, if so, confirm attendance at the 2/17/2017 status conference.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 EUGENE FORTE, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 1:13-cv-1980-LJO-MJS REQUEST FOR U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TO PROSECUTE CRIMINAL CONTEMPT v. TIMOTHY SCHWARTZ, 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 The Court has ordered Plaintiff Eugene Forte to show cause why he should not be held in 13 criminal contempt for language contained in his filings and for violating a Court order. Pursuant to 14 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42(a)(2), the Court requests that the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the 15 Eastern District of California prosecute the contempt. The Court has set a status conference on February 16 17, 2017, at 11:00A.M., to schedule a substantive hearing on the matter in the future. The Court requests 17 that the U.S. Attorney’s Office inform the Court by January 27, 2017, whether it will prosecute this case 18 and, if so, confirm attendance at the February 17, 2017 status conference. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 20, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?