Forte v. Hughes et al

Filing 88

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 87 Motion to Correct Prior Order, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/26/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5

EUGENE FORTE,

6

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO CORRECT PRIOR ORDER (Doc.
87)

Plaintiff,

7
8

1:13-cv-1980-LJO-SMS

v.
TIMOTHY SCHWARTZ,

9

Defendant.

10
11
12

Plaintiff Eugene Forte moves to correct or strike the Court’s July 25, 2016 Order. Doc. 87. The

13 Court issued that Order in response to Plaintiff’s “Courtesy Notification” of a motion he filed in another
14 case pending in this Court before a different District Judge. It was not necessary for Plaintiff to file the
15 Courtesy Notice; however, the Clerk of Court docketed it as a motion, so the Court ruled on it as such.
16 Plaintiff’s motion to correct or strike the July 25, 2016 Order is therefore unnecessary as it has no
17 bearing on this or any of Plaintiff’s cases. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion (Doc. 87).
18
19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
20

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

August 26, 2016

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
1