Toscano et al v. City Of Fresno et al
ORDER Vacating February 15, 2017 Hearing on Petition for Minor's Compromise and Requiring Plaintiff Steven Wade Toscano to File Amended Payout Amounts for Annuity Based on Corrected Net Balance, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/9/17: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANGEL KEITH TOSCANO, JR., et al.,
Case No. 1:13-cv-01987-SAB
ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 15, 2017
HEARING ON PETITION FOR MINOR’S
COMPROMISE AND REQUIRING
PLAINTIFF STEVEN WADE TOSCANO
TO FILE AMENDED PAYOUT AMOUNTS
FOR ANNUITY BASED ON CORRECTED
CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
The minor plaintiffs in this action have filed petitions for compromise of the minors’
19 claims. The Court, having reviewed the record, finds these matters suitable for decision without
20 oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on
21 February 15, 2017 will be vacated and the parties will not be required to appear at that time.
Upon review of the petitions, the net settlement to Steven Wade Toscano was incorrectly
23 set forth as $52,448.92 in the September 6, 2017 supplement to approve compromise of pending
24 action for Steven Wade Toscano. (ECF No. 96.) Based on the petition, Steven Wade Toscano
25 shall receive a gross settlement amount of $75,000.00. From this amount, attorney fees of
26 $17,082.75 and costs of $5,468.25 will be deducted. This provides for a net settlement of
27 $52,449.00 for Steven Wade Toscano.
28 / / /
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The hearing set for February 15, 2017 is VACATED and the parties are not
3 required to appear at that time; and
Within fourteen days from the entry of this order, Steven Wade Toscano shall file
5 an amended annuity payout based on the net settlement amount of $52,449.00.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 9, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?