Barajas v. Virga

Filing 25

ORDER DIRECTING Respondent to File Opposition or Notice of Non-Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for a Stay; ORDER SCHEDULING the Deadline for Filing a Reply and Suspending the Deadline for Filing a Traverse, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/4/2014. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JOSE BARAJAS, Case No. 1:13-cv-02000-AWI-SKO-HC 12 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE OPPOSITION OR NOTICE OF NONOPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A STAY (DOC. 24) 13 Petitioner, v. 14 15 TIM VIRGA, Respondent. 16 17 ORDER SCHEDULING THE DEADLINE FOR FILING A REPLY AND SUSPENDING THE DEADLINE FOR FILING A TRAVERSE Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. 21 On September 2, 2014, Petitioner filed a motion for a stay of 22 the proceedings to permit exhaustion of additional claims. 23 Petitioner’s traverse to Respondent’s answer is presently due to be 24 filed on or about October 25, 2014. 25 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 26 1) Respondent is DIRECTED to file opposition or notice of non- 27 opposition to Petitioner’s motion for a stay no later than thirty 28 (30) days after the date of service of this order; and 1 1 2) Petitioner may FILE a reply to any opposition to his motion 2 no later than thirty (30) days after the date of service of the 3 opposition; and 4 3) The deadline for filing a traverse is SUSPENDED pending 5 resolution of the motion for a stay or further order of this Court. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: September 4, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?