Millner v. Biter
Filing
82
ORDER Extending Discovery and Scheduling Order Issued May 5, 2015, to Defendant Pelayo signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/22/2015. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES W. MILLNER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
MARTIN BITER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
19
Case No.: 1:13-cv-02029-SAB (PC)
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER ISSUED MAY 5, 2015,
TO DEFENDANT PELAYO
[ECF Nos. 57, 75]
Plaintiff James W. Millner is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1983.
This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim of excessive force against Defendants J.
20
Anderson, D. Rodriguez, and O. Marroquin, a cognizable claim for failure to protect against
21
Defendants W. Sweetser, R. Sulier, Pair, and Pelayo, and a cognizable claim of deliberate indifference
22
to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants J. Anderson, O.
23
Marroquin, D. Rodriguez, W. Sweetser, R. Sulier, and Pair.
24
On May 5, 2015, Defendants Marroquin, Sweetser, Pair, Anderson, Sulier, and Rodriguez filed
25
an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 54.) On this same day, the Court issued the discovery and
26
scheduling order. (ECF No. 57.)
27
28
1
On June 23, 2015, Defendants Marroquin, Sweetser, Pair, Anderson, Sulier, and Rodriguez
1
2
filed a motion for summary on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies,
3
along with a request to stay discovery pending a ruling on the exhaustion motion. (ECF Nos. 70, 71.)
4
On July 9, 2015, the Court granted Defendants’ request to stay discovery, and all merits-based
5
discovery was stayed pending a ruling on the motion for summary judgment relating to exhaustion of
6
the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 72.)
7
On July 13, 2015, Plaintiff filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on the merits of his
8
claims. (ECF No. 73.) On July 20, 2015, Defendants filed a request to stay briefing on Plaintiff’s
9
cross-motion for summary judgment pending a ruling on the exhaustion motion, and the Court granted
10
Defendants’ request on July 22, 2015. (ECF Nos. 77, 80.)
On July 17, 2015, Defendant Pelayo filed an answer to the complaint. In light of the fact that
11
12
Defendant Pelayo has now answered the complaint, it is HEREBY ORDERED the discovery and
13
scheduling order is extended to Defendant Pelayo.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated:
17
July 22, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?