Coats v. Chaudhri et al
Filing
22
ORDER DISREGARDING 21 Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Declination to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/10/2015. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS,
13
v.
MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRI, et al.,
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S
DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(ECF No. 21)
Plaintiff,
11
12
Case No. 1:13-cv-02032-BAM (PC)
Following screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this action proceeds against Defendants
17
Dr. Muhammad Chaudhri and John Doe. Defendant Chaudhri answered the complaint on February
18
18, 2015. On Febraury 19, 2015, the Court ordered Defendant Chaudhri to submit his consent or
19
decline to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge within 30 days. (ECF No. 14.)
20
On March 26, 2015, Defendant Chaudhri filed his decline to the jurisdiction of a United States
21
Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 19.) On April 8, 2015, Plaintiff objected to the “late and delayed filing”
22
of Defendant Chaudhri’s decline. (ECF No. 21, p. 1.)
23
24
25
26
27
The timeliness of Defendant Chaudhri’s decline has no effect on the orderly process of this
action. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s objections are HEREBY DISREGARDED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
April 10, 2015
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?