Estate of Stephen E. Crawley et al v. Kings County et al

Filing 67

STIPULATED DISMISSAL and ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/9/2015. Defendants, Kings County and Kings County Sheriff's Department are dismissed with prejudice.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 James J. Arendt, Esq. Bar No. 142937 Brande L. Gustafson, Esq. Bar No. 267130 Weakley & Arendt, LLP 1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176 Fresno, California 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262 James@walaw-fresno.com Brande@walaw-fresno.com 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants, Kings County, Kings County Sheriff’s Department, Shawn McRae, and Marius Barsteceanu 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN E. CRAWLEY, NORMA CRAWLEY, individually and as successor in interest to THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN E. CRAWLEY, and JOHNNY CRAWLEY, individually, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 17 18 19 KINGS COUNTY, KINGS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, DAVE ROBINSON, in his individual and official capacity as Kings County Sheriff, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 ) CASE NO. 1:13-cv-02042 LJO-SAB ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 22 Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to this action, 23 through their attorneys of record, stipulate to dismissal of Defendants County of Kings and 24 Kings County Sheriff’s Department, with prejudice, from all claims alleged in Plaintiffs’ 25 Second Amended Complaint. 26 The parties further stipulate that for purposes of vicarious liability the actions of 27 Defendants Shawn McRae and Marius Barsteceanu as alleged in the Second Amended 28 /// Stipulated  Dismissal  and  Order     Page  1   1 Complaint were taken in the course and scope of their employment with the Kings County 2 Sheriff’s Department. 3 4 DATE: June 8, 2015 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP By: 5 6 7 8 DATE: June 8, 2015 10 11 12 13 14 WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT, P.C. By: 9 /s/ James J. Arendt James J. Arendt Brande L. Gustafson Attorneys for Defendants /s/ William L. Schmidt William L. Schmidt Attorney for Plaintiffs ORDER The above stipulation is approved. The case shall remain open. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: June 9, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulated  Dismissal  and  Order     Page  2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?