Sokolsky v. State of California et al

Filing 11

ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Expedite Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/13/2014. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

MARK S. SOKOLSKY,

12

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 1:13-cv-02044 LJO DLB PC

v.
[ECF No. 10]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Mark S. Sokolsky is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

18 this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on December 16, 2013. On September
19 11, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint.
20

On November 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to expedite proceedings in this

21 action. As Plaintiff correctly states, the instant action is pending before this Court. However, the
22 Court does not have an expedited calendar. Plaintiff is advised that the Court acts to resolve all
23 pending cases in the most efficient manner possible. The Court is aware of the pending First
24 Amended Complaint. Nevertheless, the Court’s docket of pending cases is substantial, and the
25 Court must act first on those matters that have been pending the longest.
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

1

1

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to expedite proceedings is DENIED.

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

November 13, 2014

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2