Sokolsky v. State of California et al
Filing
13
ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's Motion For Temporary Appointment Of Judges (ECF No. 12 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/11/2015. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK S. SOKOLSKY,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:13-cv-02044 LJO DLB PC
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
[ECF No. 12]
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Mark S. Sokolsky is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
18 this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on December 16, 2013. On September
19 11, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint.
20
On March 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for temporary assignment of judges
21 to the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division. Plaintiff is advised that this Court is
22 without authority to temporarily assign judges to the district. Further, the Court’s jurisdiction is
23 limited to the parties before it in this action and to Plaintiff’s claims concerning the kosher meal
24 program at Coalinga State Hospital. See e.g., Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S.
25 83, 103-04, 118 S.Ct. 1003 (1998) (“[The] triad of injury in fact, causation, and redressability
26 constitutes the core of Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement, and the party invoking
27 federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing its existence.”) (citation omitted); American
28 Civil Liberties Union of Nevada v. Masto, 670 F.3d 1046, 1061-62 (9th Cir. 2012) (“[F]ederal
1
1 courts may adjudicate only actual, ongoing cases or controversies.”) (citation and internal
2 quotation marks omitted).
3
Accordingly,
Plaintiff’s
motion
for
temporary
appointment
of
judges
4 DISREGARDED.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
March 11, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
is
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?