Sokolsky v. State of California et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Default 22 , 23 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/5/16. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

MARK S. SOKOLSKY,

12
13
14

Case No. 1:13-cv-02044 LJO DLB PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENTER
DEFAULT

v.
CHRISTINE MATIVO, et al.,

[ECF Nos. 22, 23]

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Mark S. Sokolsky, a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 16, 2013. The matter was
19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local
20 Rule 302.
21

On December 9, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that

22 Plaintiff’s motion to enter default be DENIED. The Findings and Recommendations were
23 served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14)
24 days. Over fourteen days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed objections.
25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

26 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
27 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1

1 1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 9, 2015, are ADOPTED in full;

2 2.

Plaintiff’s motion to enter default against Defendants is DENIED.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

January 5, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2