Sokolsky v. State of California et al
Filing
43
ORDER EXTENDING Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendants King and Porter, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/30/2016. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK S. SOKOLSKY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:13-cv-02044 LJO DLB PC
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY
AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO
DEFENDANTS KING AND PORTER
CHRISTINE MATIVO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action.
17
18
The action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on February 4, 2016.
On April 4, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. Since then, certain
19
20
Defendants initially named have been replaced in their positions, and the current individuals holding
21
those positions have been substituted into this action.
On May 31, 2016, Defendants King and Porter filed an answer. Therefore, the Court
22
23
EXTENDS the April 4, 2016, Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendants King and Porter.
24
Deadlines to amend pleadings, conduct discovery, and file dispositive motions as set forth in the
25
initial Discovery and Scheduling Order are EXTENDED to Defendants King and Porter. In addition
26
as to Defendants King and Porter, the deadline to provide initial disclosures is set for thirty
27
///
28
///
1
1
days from the date of service of this order, and the deadline to file motions based on exhaustion is set
2
for sixty days from the date of service of this order.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
June 30, 2016
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?