Sokolsky v. State of California et al
Filing
78
ORDER vacating hearing on 61 Motion for Summary Judgment from Court's Calendar signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/5/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK S. SOKOLSKY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
1:13-cv-02044-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT FROM COURT’S
CALENDAR
(ECF No. 61.)
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Mark S. Sokolsky (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights
20
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for
21
summary judgment. (ECF No. 61.) On January 23, 2017, Defendants filed an opposition.
22
(ECF No. 65.) On March 16, 2017, Plaintiff filed a reply to the opposition. (ECF No. 67.)
23
The motion for summary judgment is pending.
24
On June 29, 2017, the court issued an order clarifying Plaintiff’s claims and permitting
25
further briefing by the parties. (ECF No. 77.) The order granted Defendants sixty days in
26
which to submit further briefing and granted Plaintiff thirty days from the date Defendants’
27
brief is filed, in which to submit further briefing. In light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil
28
Justice Reform Act, the hearing on the motion and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment
1
itself is HEREBY DEEMED VACATED from the court’s calendar until such time as the
2
motion is before the court. Local Rule 230(l).
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 5, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?