Sokolsky v. State of California et al
ORDER DISCHARGING 79 Order to Show Cause; ORDER DISMISSING Defendant Rebecca Domrese from this Action; ORDER for Clerk to Reflect Dismissal of Defendant Domrese on the Court's Docket signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/14/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARK S. SOKOLSKY,
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE
(ECF No. 79.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
REBECCA DOMRESE FROM THIS
ORDER FOR CLERK TO REFLECT
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT DOMRESE
ON THE COURT’S DOCKET
Mark S. Sokolsky (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint
commencing this action on December 16, 2013. (ECF No. 1.)
On July 7, 2017, the court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty
days, why defendant Rebecca Domrese should not be dismissed from this action based on
inability to serve process. (ECF No. 79.) The twenty-day deadline has passed, and Plaintiff
has not responded to the order to show cause. Therefore, defendant Rebecca Domrese shall be
dismissed from this action.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The court’s order to show cause, issued on July 7, 2017, is DISCHARGED;
Defendant Rebecca Domrese is DISMISSED from this action;
This action now proceeds only against defendants Audrey King, Daniel Meek,
Jeannie Porter, and Isaac Bonsu for denial of free exercise of religion under the
First Amendment and violation of RLUIPA; and defendants King, Porter, and
Bonsu for violation of due process based on conditions of confinement; and
The Clerk of Court is directed to reflect the dismissal of defendant Rebecca
Domrese from this action on the court’s docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
August 14, 2017
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?