Arnett v. Walgreen Company, Inc.

Filing 3

ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 02/10/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY WAYNE ARNETT, 12 13 14 No. 1:13-CV-2066-LJO-MJS Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WALGREEN COMPANY, INC., (ECF No. 2) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, Timothy Wayne Arnett (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action. 18 Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915 19 on December 19, 2013. (ECF No. 2) The Court has reviewed the Motion and finds that 20 Plaintiff’s application demonstrates that he is entitled to proceed without prepayment of 21 fees. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is therefore GRANTED. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 10, 2014 /s/ 25 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?