Marentes v. Key Energy Services California, Inc.

Filing 44

ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Close this Case Due to the Stipulation of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/13/17. CASE CLOSED.(Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

V. Andre Sherman (SBN 198684)
[e-mail]
GIRARDI & KEESE
1127 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 91203
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Douglas Han (SBN 232858)
[e-mail]
JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION
411 N. Central Avenue, Suite 500
Glendale, California 91203
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Edwin Aiwazian (SBN 232943)
[e-mail]
LAWYERS for JUSTICE, PC
410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203
Glendale, California 91203
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Rene Marentes

17

BUCHALTER
A Professional Corporation
KALLEY R. AMAN (SBN: 217337)
1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, CA 90017-2457
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

18

Attorneys for Defendant

14
15
16

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21
22

RENE MARENTES, individually, and on behalf
of other members of the general public similarly
situated,

23

Plaintiff,

24

vs.

25

KEY ENERGY SERVICES CALIFORNIA,
INC., an unknown business entity; and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,

26
27
28

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-02067 AWI JLT
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE
DUE TO THE STIPULATION OF
COUNSEL
(Doc. 43)

1

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

2

Plaintiff Rene Marentes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Key Energy Services of

3

California, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record named herein,

4

hereby submit this Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice.
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2017 the Parties reached the principal terms of an

5
6

individual settlement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL,

7
8

HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1.

10
11
12

Plaintiff Rene Marentes’s individual claims shall be dismissed with

2.

9

Class allegations shall be dismissed without prejudice.

prejudice.

DATED: March 13, 2017

13

BUCHALTER
A Professional Corporation

14

By: /s/ KALLEY R. AMAN
KALLEY R. AMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
KEY ENERGY SERVICES
CALIFORNIA, INC.

15
16
17
18
19

DATED: March 13, 2017

JUSTICE LAW CORPORATION

20
21
22
23

By: /s/ DOUGLAS HAN
DOUGLAS HAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff RENE
MARENTES

24
25
26
27
28

ORDER
The parties have stipulated to dismiss this matter and, in doing so, rely upon Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a). Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, “the plaintiff

1

may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all

2

parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order

3

of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v.

4

City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to

5

close this action in light of the stipulation as dictated by Rule 41(a).

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 13, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28