Lawrence v. Discover Financial Services, LLC et al.
Filing
24
Stipulation and ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice Between Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union, LLC Only, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/28/2014. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Debra A. Miller, Esq. (IN #27254-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: dmiller@schuckitlaw.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
Designated Counsel for Service
7
11
Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231)
Tate &th
Associates
1321 8 Street, Suite 4
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: 510-525-5100
Fax: 510-525-5130
E-Mail: mkl@tateandassociates-law.com
12
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
8
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
FRESNO DIVISION
SHERIE LYNNE LAWRENCE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC;
TRANS UNION, LLC; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; and DOES
1-10, inclusive;
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:13-cv-02076-LJO-JLT
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION,
LLC, ONLY
23
24
25
Plaintiff Sherie Lynne Lawrence, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans
26
Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been
27
compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be
28
dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 1:13-CV-02076-LJO-JLT
Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
3
4
Date: February 28, 2014
5
6
7
8
9
/s/
G. Thomas Martin, III (w/consent)
G. Thomas Martin, III, Esq.
Price Law Group
15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
Telephone: 818-907-2030
Fax: 818-205-2730
E-Mai: tom@plglawfirm.com
Counsel for Sherie Lynne Lawrence
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Date: February 28, 2014
/s/
Debra A. Miller
Debra A. Miller, Esq. (IN #27254-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: dmiller@schuckitlaw.com
19
20
21
22
23
24
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231)
Tate &th
Associates
1321 8 Street, Suite 4
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: 510-525-5100
Fax: 510-525-5130
E-Mail: mkl@tateandassociates-law.com
25
26
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 1:13-CV-02076-LJO-JLT
Page 2 of 3
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff
3
Sherie Lynne Lawrence against Defendant Trans Union, LLC are dismissed, with prejudice.
4
Plaintiff Sherie Lynne Lawrence and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each bear their own
5
costs and attorneys’ fees. The clerk is directed not to close this action.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
February 28, 2014
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
Date: ________________________
14
15
____________________________________
JUDGE, United States District Court,
Eastern District of California
DISTRIBUTION TO:
16
17
18
19
20
21
G. Thomas Martin, III, Esq.
tom@pglawfirm.com
Rana Nader, Esq.
rnader@jonesday.com
Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq.
mkl@tateandassociates-law.com
Alan Stanley Petlak, Esq.
petlaka@ballardspahr.com
Ethan W. Chernin, Esq.
chernine@ballardspahr.com
Thomas P. Quinn, Jr., Esq.
tquinn@nokesquinn.com
Debra A. Miller, Esq.
dmiller@schuckitlaw.com
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 1:13-CV-02076-LJO-JLT
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?