Walker v. Moore

Filing 51

ORDER APPOINTING Limited Purpose Counsel for Purposes of Settlement signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/2/2016. Attorney Brian Curtis McComas for Darryl Walker added. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DARRYL WALKER, 11 12 13 14 1:13-cv-02102-DAD-EPG-PC Plaintiff, ORDER APPOINTING LIMITED PURPOSE COUNSEL FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT vs. C/O MOORE, Defendant. 15 16 Darryl Walker (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court finds that the appointment of counsel for Plaintiff is 18 warranted for the limited purpose of assisting Plaintiff with preparing for and participating in a 19 settlement conference. Brian C. McComas has been selected from the Court’s pro bono attorney 20 panel to represent Plaintiff and has agreed to be appointed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 22 1. Brian C. McComas is appointed as limited purpose counsel in the above entitled matter. 23 This appointment is for the limited purpose of assisting Plaintiff with preparing for and 24 participating in a settlement conference. 25 2. In a separate order, the Court shall schedule a settlement conference for this case. 26 3. Brian C. McComas’s appointment will terminate fifteen days after completion of the 27 settlement conference, or any continuation of the settlement conference, unless extended 28 by Court order. 1 1 2 3 4 4. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park at (916) 930-4278, or via email at spark@caed.uscourts.gov if he has any questions related to the appointment. 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Brian C. McComas, 5 Law Office of B. C. McComas, 77 Van Ness Ave., Suite 101, San Francisco, California 6 94102. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 2, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?