U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ayala AG Services

Filing 9

Request for Voluntary Dismissal of Petitioner's EEOC's Application for Order to Show Cause why Subpoenas Should not be Enforced; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/2/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY )
COMMISSION,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
AYALA AG SERVICES,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)

Case No. 1:13-mc-0032 SKO
REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF PETITIONER EEOC’S
APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SUBPOENAS
SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED;
ORDER

16

TO THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DEFENDANT:

17

Petitioner United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”)

18

seeks dismissal of this action, filed against Respondent Ayala AG Services (“Respondent”) for

19

enforcement of the EEOC’s Administrative Subpoena Nos. LA-13-014 and No. LA-13-015,

20

pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-9.

21

On September 25, 2013, the Court held a hearing on this matter. The Court issued an

22

order (Docket No. 6) enforcing the EEOC’s subpoenas on October 15, 2013. The EEOC served

23

a copy of this order on Respondent Ayala. (Docket No. 7).

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

EEOC’S Request for Dismissal

1
2

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff EEOC now
seeks dismissal of this subpoena enforcement without prejudice.

3
4

Dated: October 2, 2014

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

5
6
By:

7
8

/s/ Rumduol Vuong
RUMDUOL VUONG
Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

EEOC’S Request for Dismissal

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the notice of dismissal filed by Petitioner under Federal Rule of Civil

3

Procedure 41(a)(2), this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall

4

administratively close this case.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 2, 2014

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

EEOC’S Request for Dismissal